Comments: 1
In the time of the Greeks and Romans, little was truly understood about the world. To explain natural phenomena, society developed mythologies about how reality operated. Most of us are familiar with the Greek gods. The rising and setting of the sun was Apollo riding his chariot. Lightning was Zeus casting bolts down from Mount Olympus. Death was passing the River Styx and being welcomed by Hades. Want to have a baby? Pray to the goddess Aphrodite, who was responsible for love and fertility.
As human knowledge increased, so did the sophistication of the explanations. Humans moved from anthropomorphizing the natural world to a more philosophical and sophisticated way of thinking about existence. Monotheistic religions arose which didn’t seek to explain every sunrise or sunset as the act of a god, but instead attributed human purpose to a deity who provided rules for living a fulfilling life and making the world a better place.
The next jump happened in the Enlightenment when humanity reordered the solar system, putting the sun in the middle and relegating the earth to just one planet in an increasingly crowded planetary system. But the key breakthrough of the Enlightenment was the creation of a system to uncover truths about the world around us. Today, we call this the scientific method.
At its most basic, the scientific method consists of several different components. They are:
-
Observation of the world.
-
The creation of theories about this world in the form of a hypothesis.
-
The testing of this hypothesis to see if it is correct or not.
-
The addition of this hypothesis to our body of knowledge, if correct, or the discarding of the hypothesis, if not.
-
The continued testing and revision of a hypothesis based on additional knowledge and information.
-
The storage, sharing, and propagation of this information to other experts and the wider community.
The process is like a flywheel that is always spinning, always churning through hypotheses to see which make the cut and which do not, accelerating with each rotation to generate more and more knowledge.
Why is this so important? Because what we see in the world around us is often not easily explainable and truth and insight derived from the scientific method can have profound impacts on how we behave and our future.
Take the case of washing hands. For most of human history, humans did not understand how germs spread. So, after medical procedures, doctors would visit other patients without washing their hands. Infections were rampant; death from infections a common occurrence. It was in a Hungarian hospital that progress began. A Hungarian doctor named Ignaz Semmeleis noticed that infant deaths in the doctors’ ward were higher than in the nurses’ ward. Priests visited patients in the doctors’ ward, so an initial hypothesis was that these religious men were somehow spreading disease and the staff prevented the priests from entering. It made no difference. Dr. Simmelweis continued to study the problem and realized that the doctors often visited their maternity patients after performing autopsies. Dr. Simmelweis developed a second hypothesis that cadaveric matter might account for the difference (at this time, science hadn’t yet uncovered the role of germs). He then tested this theory by having the doctors wash their hands with chlorinated lime after autopsies. This small change led to a huge decline in the mortality rate in the doctors’ ward, dropping it to the same level as the nurses’.
It took another hundreds years for scientists using the scientific method to fully understand how germs work and come up with a true scientific rationale for hand washing. Today, doctors not only wash their hands, but also sterilize their instruments between procedures. Imagine, it has been less than two hundred years since humanity has gained the knowledge that washing hands prevents the spread of disease!
Without the scientific method this information would have never been developed, or if it had, it would have remained isolated to one individual or country. In the meantime, hundreds of millions of people would have died from infections in childbirth and from both simple and complex medical procedures.
There are many ways to explain a phenomenon. But unless that explanation, that hypothesis, stands up to rigorous testing, it doesn’t have practical value that can improve the physical world around us. Ascendants acknowledge the importance of science, testing, and repeatable results as the path to knowledge creation and a better world.
Science and Religion
Critics would say this is a techno-scientific way of looking at the world that completely discounts religion. Ascension believes there is an important place in this world for religion. While the scientific method helps us fortify the world around us and build a better future, religion can help fortify the soul.
A good friend of mine, Hans Chen, once provided the best explanation to me of the power of religion. He hypothesized that the Western world would not have become the pre-eminent power in the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries without religion. Only religion gave sailors who feared they would fall off a flat earth the faith and courage to sail on. Priests, sometimes on zealous religious quests, traveled far into unexplored territory to spread the word of God. In doing so, they helped to spread knowledge.
Religion played other roles. The Jewish Torah and Talmud codified systems of behavior and methods of adjudication which eventually evolved into our judicial system. And it was the monks, priests, and imams of the middle ages who preserved knowledge that would eventually flower again in the Enlightenment.
Many people of faith also believe in science. The two are not incompatible. The list of individuals of faith who have made significant contributions to knowledge creation is long. Albert Einstein was unsure of the existence of God but would not rule it out, calling himself agnostic, and often seeing the thumbprint of “God” in the beauty of the world. Perhaps a higher power bequeathed to humans the ability to create knowledge, or perhaps we stole that gift as Prometheus did with fire.
Faith is an integral part of Ascension but it is not required. Faith, like many things in life, is a choice that each person can and should make for themselves. Ascension is open to you regardless of the path you choose.
The Founding Fathers realized that religion should always be a choice and enshrined in the very First Amendment of the Constitution:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…
This choice in personal belief, combined with the rights enshrined in the Constitution, was a fundamental building block in the growth of knowledge in the 19th and 20th centuries.
Submitted: July 17, 2024
© Copyright 2025 Ascendance. All rights reserved.
Chapters
Comments
Facebook Comments
More Non-Fiction Books
Discover New Books
Boosted Content from Other Authors
Book / Romance
Short Story / Other
Short Story / Other
Poem / Poetry
Boosted Content from Premium Members
Short Story / Literary Fiction
Book / Poetry
Article / Non-Fiction
Poem / Science Fiction
Other Content by Ascendance
Book / Non-Fiction
Article / Non-Fiction
Article / Non-Fiction
Mr. Numi Who
1. The problem with current science is that it is clueless -- it is not guided by an intelligent philosophy. This is why evil easily commandeers science -- humanity is still universally clueless. This is where my philosophy enters the picture -- it guides science, even as science feeds back into my philosophy, since the foundation of my philosophy is Verified Knowledge, which is best given by science. Not everything is verifiable, however (such as the core temperature of the sun). Now we must rely on lesser sources, such as Mathematical and Physical Models of Reality, Statistical Probability (better if based on Big Data), Knowledge Verified by the Public (gravity is verified every day by everyone, for example), and Scholarly Work (our best guesses based on current evidence).
Sat, July 20th, 2024 12:33am3. You state that more knowledge will help us behave better in the future. That is weak, and it will be ignored, and it will have no impact. It is stronger to say that more knowledge will increase all of our odds of survival in this harsh and deadly universe. That is more to the point (less wishy-washy and limp-wristed) (i.e. less vague and nebulous).
4. The hand washing story reflects what our philosophies are up against -- blind and prejudiced resistance.
5. Interesting to note that our thoughts are similar because it is the time for such thoughts in history. Given what we know now as a species, many people will be having these similar thoughts. The interesting question is, what terms and vocabulary will they come up with? If they add to the diversity of terms for the same basic thinking, great.
6. We differ on religion. You believe it can fortify the soul. That is just pure hogwash. It is clinging to beliefs in spite of our new grasps on reality. I deem religions our primitive guesses as to what reality was when, as a species, we knew little to nothing about reality, guesses that either contradict themselves, or have long since been contradicted by evidence, or were just plain wildly wrongheaded in the first place, but forwarded by devious, self-serving minds who found them useful for personal gain. You are just pandering to the Powers that Be (religions). Stop it! We cannot survive on make-believe, and the only true source of happiness is when we know that we are doing all that we can to expand our security in this harsh and deadly universe. All else is folly, and the source of courage that you speak of is self-delusion, which, granted, is not evil in itself, it is just a tool. Like a hammer, it is how it is used that matters...
7. You speak of religions and justice, but their precepts are weak. Do not kill? That has failed. It was Do not murder, but even that failed to prevent it, since it offered no adequate explanation as to why. My philosophy offers Ultimate Morality, which is based on the Ultimate Goal, which is to secure the Ultimate Value of Life and Existence, which was derived from the answer to the Greatest of the Great Questions of Life and Existence: which was Why Bother to Do Anything At All? (such as answer the other Great Questions of Life).
8. You speak of 'believing in science', which is a horrible statement. You do not want 'belief' ANYWHERE in science. Give things probabilities instead. Believing is synonymous with insanity. If you keep religion as a part of your Ascendance, then it will fail, if not be ridiculed along the way for its weakness.
Author
Reply
I'm a pragmatist. I can see even in a "rational" societies, people care about religion. Some of the smartest people I know are religious. Ascendance doesn't require people to think or act a certain way as long as it contributes to knowledge creation. Looking at human history, I would say, on the whole, religion has had a net positive impact on knowledge creation. One could make a strong argument that the Enlightenment wouldn't have happened without religion. I would also say that stories and myths are part of the human condition. I have no desire to create a techno-centric society that strips the humanity out of existence.
Mon, July 22nd, 2024 5:42pm